• Nobody@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The mistake is thinking Elon is a moron screwing everything up on accident. He isn’t. He’s an Afrikaner white supremacist Nazi who is causing all this damage on purpose.

    Starlink and SpaceX should be nationalized before he gets a chance to weaponize those companies against the western world as well.

  • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ya all looking at this like it’s a conspiracy. It’s just a guy looking to sell more cars. Shame on anyone who thought it’s a real thing.

  • Peaty@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    China has the advantage of not having to care about the citizens’ desires in regards to be relocated to make the rail possible.

    • zephyreks@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Kelo v. City of New London. That’s all you need to know about the US’ “care” for citizens’ desires as far as eminent domain is concerned.

      • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The US still has things like reelection to consider with these things. China doesnt. And if someone speaks up against the government they just get arrested

    • Peddlephile@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They also provide apartments to live in permanently for those displaced in the development.

      Meanwhile, the US has not built high speed rail and has tent cities.

      In the case of national infrastructure, China wins hands down.

      Although it’s kind of ridiculous to compare California with an entire country…

  • balderdash@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    China wants unity, even in places where it doesn’t make economic sense.

    edit: 100% downvotes are coming from people that don’t know the situation. The CCP wants fast travel to major population centers even when the rail line isn’t profitable.

    • zephyreks@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It makes economic sense but not financial sense. Railways are almost always profitable once considering second and third order effects.

      It’s the same story with Amtrak, so I’m not sure why people are so confused. Amtrak loses money on every train that’s not the NEC.

    • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Isn’t that a good thing? sounds like the rail is being run as a public utility rather than a business. And its still likely profitable if you average the cost over all the lines.

      • balderdash@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I never said it was a good/bad thing. I’m saying the Chinese gov. isn’t as concerned with profit. Which explains the difference between California and China

  • uniqueid198x@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is misleadingly reductionist. California high speed rail has made consistant progess in that time. That progress has been slower than ourslowest expectations. It demonstrates the void of expertise the US has in rail megaprojects. However, that expertise is being built, slowly and painfully. Its still forward progress for a nation which tore up half its rail overthe last 50 years.