• NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      Seeing how effective they are in combat makes me wonder if they’re more useful than the Abrams. I’d imagine they’re significantly easier to maintain.

      • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        Different tools for different problems. Abrams is specialized to do a few things amazing and the Bradley is a general purpose tool that can do many things very well. We see the Bradley succeeding because it is in the right environment with a prepared team of operators. Abrams succeed where the only thing that doesn’t shoot is a camera.

  • Palkom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 month ago

    It wouldn’t surprise one bit me to see Ukrainian veterans training westerners on their own weapon systems when this shit is over. Their experiences will be irreplaceable.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      You can be sure folks from Raytheon and similar are pouring over the data and getting every interview they can