• remotelove@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I am confused. It’s photoshopped, but I don’t know the significance or why. (The pic I attached here has been jpg’d much more, so I suspect it’s the fake.)

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    Jackson had the good fortune to be killed early on. He’d have shown himself to be another incompetent confederate had he gotten the chance.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Jackson I actually have a strange kind of (limited) respect for. On one hand, absolutely, he was a traitor serving one of the most abominable causes known to man. On the other hand, of all the traitors, him and Longstreet are the only ones with any sort of competence or humanity in them.

      Jackson was a religious fanatic, but to the point of breaking law and custom to teach slaves how to read, and was never a major supporter of slavery himself. He also was a legitimately daring cavalry commander. Ignore this, I made a dumb mistake.

      Tear his statues down, certainly. No traitor nor supporter of that abominable cause ought to be honored. But I’ll freely admit he’s not as bad as his fellow traitors.

      • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Fuck Jackson with a pole. Still have to admire his fucking guile and bravado. What he did to my blood and our nation is unforgivable and he his ideals can rot in hell for all I care. Still he was a warrior that faced their enemy in arms so I give them acknowledgment.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Fuck, no, I just made a mistake. I mixed him up with his subordinate, JEB Stuart. The bit about the religiousity still stands.

          • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            He was an absolute religious fanatic who also not only rationalized slavery into his world view, but used religion to do so.

            I won’t besmirch his talents as a military general, but I certainly would not put him on the same level as Longstreet in terms of overall respectability.

  • Hegar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    I was really hoping this was going to be a meme about Ramesis III tearing down statues of those failed Shekelesh snowflakes.

    • elliot_crane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m no expert on Civil War figures, but the guy in the statue has a different hairline than every picture of Sherman that I’ve ever seen. Statue guy has the widow’s peak/M-shape, but Sherman was never painted or photographed with a pronounced widow’s peak or receding hair on the edges like that.

      • Test_Tickles@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Every so often I see the true power of the internet happening right in front of me and I am awed. Given the oddities of humanity, I would be not surprised at someone being an expert on civil war figures, or even civil war hairlines, but here I am and I just found the world’s expert on Sherman’s hair line… Just Sherman.
        Fucking amazing.

        • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          I think the more likely scenario is that you have simply encountered a civil war buff.

          And like most all other civil war buffs, they’ve seen plenty of pictures of generals, certainly enough to know what they look like.

          To me, Sherman has always sort of stood out for having a fairly modern look. Like…if dressed in normal clothes for 2024, his hair and overall appearance wouldn’t seem especially out of place or anachronistic. This as opposed to say, Longstreet or Stuart with their enormous beards, or Burnside with his…well…sideburns.

          • elliot_crane@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            Haha nah I wouldn’t consider myself a Civil War buff. I just think Sherman was pretty dope for… well, going full Sherman on the confederates. So it stands to reason that I can easily ID him in pictures.