• Synth@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    I dunno if it was you asking the question or not but ^^;; if you want some decent replacements for gimp I recommend krita, it’s more Photoshop like and honestly it’s my go-to however there is also photopea which is a browser editor that I heard is actually pretty good, and if you’re on Mac or Windows (if so I dunno why you’d post here XD) I recommend the Affinity suit, it’s cheaper than Photoshop and it’s a one time payment instead of a subscription.

  • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s that phenomenon where people who endured trauma to attain something expect others to also endure the trauma.

    I’ve tried learning GIMP, and it sucks. I’m not saying GIMP sucks, but you have to be crazy to not see that it’s hard to learn.

  • ian@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Gimp isn’t perfect. But neither is Photoshop. In fact Lightroom users grizzle that Photoshop is so much harder to use than Lightroom. It’s a different animal.

    I use Pinta or Paint.Net when I want a quick edit. But Gimp has the tools for serious editing. More tools, more hard to use.

    Some Gimp things, yes! should be improved. And other things are being improved as we speak. And some things can be done on a photo much easier in Inkscape.

    I hope the whiners donated to Gimp development? No? Then just please step back, and think for a bit. If thinking is too hard, then just take a deep breath.

    • Ullallulloo@civilloquy.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Donating to GIMP will not likely make it user-friendly enough to make me use it unless absolutely forced to. I would much rather donate to Pinta or Paint.NET or something where development would actually benefit me.

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    anyone who has ever used image editing software professionally knows gimp’s ui sucks very much.

    we could have had an opensource photoshop killer if the developers werent adamant to keep the 90s workflow holding it back for so damn long.

    “you are using it wrong!!” my ass.

    • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I feel like the issue is that people expect a “Photoshop killer” to be Photoshop verbatim. Instead of focusing on making a good tool, people just constantly compare it to the commercial pack leader.

      Most of the complaints I hear about GIMP are just “x isn’t like Photoshop”. I would take the complaints more seriously if any of the people voicing them could actually articulate what should be improved.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        we saw a similar thing with blender, everyone kept shitting their pants over blender, until studios started actually using it, and then nobody cared.

        Most of the complaints are just people mad that they have to learn something. As is true for most things in life.