• Tetsuo@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      What about laws that just concerns them ?

      Because saying no to every law reducing their revenues seems to also be frequently blocked…

      Who the hell gets to decide their own salary beside some lawmakers?

  • luckystarr@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    We should call it by what it really is: a power grab by the ruling class, upsetting the checks and balances that were achieved through decades and decades of struggle.

  • Neshura@bookwormstory.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I am so incredibly surprised by this…

    Who am I kidding it was clear from the start they were going to do this. It just further proves that:

    • they know this shit erodes any semblance of private digital communications down to the bedrock
    • this thing being for “the protection of children” is just a front for them to lie it into effect

    At this point I cannot take any politician seriously who would vote “yes” to this surveilance law given the blatant malicious intent behind it.

  • 0x815@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    And one detail here is that mainstream media don’t report on this. They do as if it didn’t happen.