• dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    It’s not just Honey swapping the affiliate codes. Practically all the major coupon sites do it too. That’s why they require you to click on a coupon code to reveal it. When you click, they usually reveal the coupon code in a new tab, and helpfully redirect the current tab to the store, using their affiliate link.

    It’s more obvious when websites do it though, since they can’t auto-close the tab like Honey does. They also don’t automatically pop up at checkout like Honey does.

    I imagine some of the other coupon extensions do the exact same thing as Honey though.

  • arc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I wonder what websites think of this toolbar stealing affiliate links from people doing all the work of promoting their prices. I wonder if Honey goes even further and turns vanilla purchases into affiliate purchases, actively stealing actual money from the site. If I were NewEgg or whoever else Honey has created affiliate links with, I think I’d be banning their affiliate account right now, or throwing in some captchas so their link theft doesn’t work any more.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Why am I entirely not surprised that LMG knew what the fuck was going on, and didnt say a fuckin thing about it.

    Made more public comments over legitimate criticism about his “just trust me, bro” warranty, than about honey being a out and out scam.

    • Christian@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Never watched the channel, but I would guess that being tech-themed makes it a worse look that they promoted it for so long before catching the issue, so they were worried it would cast doubt on all other endorsements and tank the value of advertising with them.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I think coming out and pointing out what honey did would probably be the least damaging thing they’ve done in the past few years.

        because holy fuck have they had some whoppers.

  • weeeeum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 hours ago

    If you dont know how a business makes money, chances are its some shady stuff

    Providing coupons on stuff for free, with zero ads? Thats pretty weird. Being Bought by PayPal for 4 BILLION dollars?!?!? There has to be some real sketchy shit.

    • BleatingZombie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      While I agree with you, I think we should be careful about allowing the ignorant to be punished. It’s unreasonable for a non-tech-savvy person to be aware of all the ways a company can screw you. If they’re skeptical of everything, they can’t use anything

  • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 hours ago

    It’s kind of ridiculous how long it has taken for people to realise that this is happening… where did people think that their referrals had gone after they cratered?

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      People realised years ago but didn’t really care much. End users generally don’t care since it doesn’t directly impact them, and “influencers” will often take a sponsorship deal without thoroughly researching the product or service being advertised, and probably just figured that people were buying less stuff due to the economy or whatever.

      The tech-savvy people that realised what’s happening tend to either avoid afilliate links, or use a cash back service (TopCashback, Rakuten, etc) that requires you to use their affiliate link.

      It’s not just Honey doing this. Practically all the major coupon sites do it too.

    • BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Thats where I’m at, I thought it was fairly obvious it was doing this and theres a hundred extensions like this. Are real people surprised this is how it works?

  • NotNotMike@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I’m glad this information is coming to light because I think that it should be fixed, at least as far as the affiliate link piece goes, but I find myself irritated by the sensationalism of the poster.

    They’re really pushing to make this seem as evil as possible, and milking it for every drop it’s worth. Making this a two-part series and not exposing it immediately feels super shitty to me.

    Just post the full information you have, if this is really so bad, stop trying to farm clips.

    Also, not enough focus on the timeline. Honey’s business model has changed dramatically since it was released long ago, and I feel like the part two video is going to complain about the original Honey business model, which was literally just a coupon code aggregator, just based on the “cliffhanger” at the end

    • Imhotep@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      it should be fixed

      It’s not a mistake, but an incredibly unethical business model. Why minimize the issue?

      not exposing it immediately feels super shitty to me

      it doesn’t change anything to the facts though

      It’s serialization, as old as printed news. You can dislike that but it’s not like he’s the only one doing it

    • freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      The dude spent a year figuring this out, researching and getting all his ducks in a row. What did you do, whats your contribution? Oh, let’s see, you bravely complained in a comments section about the way he chose to release the info, accusing him of the crime of sensationalism for clicks.

      Gee, why would he want to get paid for his work?? HOW SELFISH! It’s not like there are companies out there trying to steal content creator revenue, right??

      The way you complain more about him than the company, makes me wonder, do you work for Paypal, or that new project, Pie? Just weird to see you trying to make him look bad for wanting to get paid for his work. Sounds like a Honey thing to do.

      • NotNotMike@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        My guy take it down a notch, damn. I’m not calling for his head on a pike, I have legitimate and valid criticisms. I apologize if the tone came off more critical than I meant it but hot hell you came in spicy.

        But, to address your issue:

        Why does one wrong make a right? Why does him exposing the issue invalidate any criticisms or expectations of quality or integrity? To me it does not, hence why I criticize. And I even said I was glad the information is coming to light, and I’m grateful for him drawing attention to it, I just wish it could have been done a little more tactfully is all. I would like to have all the information right now, rather than waiting for a “part 2”.

        I also just don’t appreciate the stoking of anger, which has clearly worked. Ragebait is toxic and that’s what is being done with this story, from my perspective, so I don’t love it.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      If you look at their history, they seem to be a younger YouTube channel. I think he’s breaking it up more so that he can actually put out one video a month and not lose subscribers. He seems to be slowly managing to make the videos longer each month.

      • NotNotMike@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I suspected it was a smaller channel, but didn’t look myself. I haven’t heard of them up until this point so this story could be a particularly big opportunity for them, so it makes sense why they are choosing the delivery method that they are

  • Elrecoal19@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Can someone ELI5? Does this mean they used refferal codes from people that had these “bring a friend” referal codes?

    • cristo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      Esperanto
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 hours ago

      No, it’s a little more complicated than that. How a video explained it was, say someone was trying to sell you a TV, you decide to buy that TV and the salesman gives you a card to let the cashier know who the salesman was to get the commission. When you’re at the checkout line, a different sales man comes up and offers to find you a coupon code to help save you money. In the process of looking, regardless of if a coupon code is found, the second salesman takes the original card the previous salesman gives you and switches it with his own unbeknownst to you or the original salesman. Then when you buy the product the second guy gets the commission.

    • teije9@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      some companies, instead of paying youtubers a lot of money to promote the product, tell them ‘we will give you some percentage of every sale we make that was advertised by you’ They do this by giving the youtuber an affiliate link. its basically the link to the product, except for that when you open it you get a cookie that says ‘[youtuber] brought me here’ What honey did, was replace those cookies with theirs, meaning they get the cut from the sale, instead of the youtuber.

      with for example, NordVPN, you get 35 dollars per sale with your affiliate link. if you watched a youtube video about NordVPN and then went into the description to buy it with the YouTubers affiliate link, honey would pop up and say ‘we have no coupons for you’ if you clicked on the close button of the popup honey would replace that cookie with theirs; if you would currently buy a NordVPN subscription, the money would go to honey, instead of to the youtuber that advertised it to you (who deserve the money)

  • cum@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I knew Honey was sketchy, but I just assumed it made it’s money from just data harvesting everything

    • Steak@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Yeah I always felt something was off with honey. I never downloaded it for that reason, it was just kinda too good to be real or something. Like how are they making enough money to pay all these YouTubers to promote them? Something wasn’t adding up

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        how are they making enough money to pay all these YouTubers to promote them? Something wasn’t adding up

        1. Know average amount of revenue a customer gives you over some period of time
        2. Figure out what percentage of that you’re willing to lose
        3. Get a loan
        4. Use that loan to pay to advertise to get customers you wouldn’t have anyways
        5. After the period of time (mentioned in step one) passes you’ll have a profit if everything went correctly

        It’s not really a mystery.

      • smayonak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        If you have multiple extensions installed honey always secretly steals the revenue from competitors without asking for consent. Most other extensions will ask if you want to activate cashback. Honey just disables their competitors and steals that affiliate revenue. It should be classified as malware

      • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        The thing is I think it’s feasible to do this in a non gross way…it’s essentially a search engine that just looks for promo codes, matches them against brands, and then tries them in rapid succession on the checkout screen. I think they would probably need humans to resolve the many 1-off issues (could work in a crowdsource manner like adblock filters) and a central registry to keep track of which ones fail, but it’s not a hugely complex problem.

  • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I am fine with them scamming influencers. I am not fine with them being paid by websites to not give the best deals

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Your okay with a large corporation stealing from the working class? Why is that? I’m sure only a very few of the make good money.

      • ghurab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        well, this segment of the working class are selling obvious scams to their audience, so its a funny ironic justice. People like Linus from LTT, only stopped because he found out they are scamming him as well, not just the audience.

        • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Yep. and he decided to let the scam keep happening to everyone else by being absolutely silencio on the subject.

      • Piemanding@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Maybe because anyone who calls themselves “influencers” are just as bad as corporate execs, but, oftentimes, more insistent/stupid in their shilling so people hate them more.

    • smayonak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Topcashback consistently beats honey and others out (almost all competitors beat honey btw). And they pay out and have customer support. Easily thr best way to sell your personal data to a shadowy data broker

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        All TopCashback is doing is taking the commission and giving you some of it. They take less of a cut than other sites like Rakuten, which I guess they can do since they have fewer overheads (eg I’ve never seen a TV ad for them). I don’t think they’re selling any user data.

        • smayonak@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          The permissions on their extension allows for them to read site data so they definitely could operate as a data broker. However their tos has no mention of any data sharing so you are likely correct that they just take a commission. Great site imo

          • dan@upvote.au
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I didn’t even realise they have an extension. I just use the site.

            I also use CashbackMonitor.com, which lets you look up a site and see a list of all the cashback sites that support it. Sometimes, during promotions (like Black Friday), Rakuten’s cashback is temporarily higher than TopCashback’s.

  • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Technically isn’t telling anybody anything “stealing”? You’re transmitting a copy of the information and whoever created it gets nothing.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    23 hours ago

    In the entire time I used Honey, I never once got a valid coupon code for literally anything. Pretty sure they scraped a ton of my browsing data though.

    • RebekkaAnsal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Are you aware that there are other chrome extensions that offer more coupons for a ton of online stores? Dontpayfull Automatic Coupons or Retailmenot always have plenty of coupons available. I don’t understand why everyone is stuck on Honey, which has been of very low quality in recent years.

      • ansiz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I need to check this out, sounds pretty interesting to me. I never tried Honey because it seemed way too shady!

    • viralJ@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Same here. Newer found a single coupon for me. I uninstalled it a few months ago, not because I thought it was sketchy, but because I figured it must be better at finding discounts for things that I don’t shop for online, like shoes and pizzas or something.

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I don’t shop for online, like shoes and pizzas

        How do you shop for pizza not-online? Bro still going with pizzas brochures? Respect bro. If you top that off ny ordering by landline, it’d be perfect.

        But yeah I had similar thoughts on Honey, never installed and now I think I definitely won’t. Thx 4 i Lemmy

        • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Why would you need to order pizza online? Not everyone wants to pay fees for the “convenience” of paying more for the food and having to type in my credit card info myself. You call them up, you get a better price, and you pay when you get there.

          • Dasus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Why would you need to ordering pizza, period?

            Food ordering apps aren’t convenient as fuck and I dare you to argued against that.

            If you live in a bigger city and have trusty restaurant’s with trusty service, yeah, call em. I do for two of my trusty places, but theyre rather far and expensive from where I now live. And the places around here change like everyone year or two. So yeah.

            Most people use apps.

            • Noxy@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 hours ago

              Food ordering apps aren’t convenient as fuck

              I agree. Nothing convenient about overpaying to entrust your food to underpaid, unvetted delivery workers

              • Dasus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 hours ago

                God I hate this new phone the screen is just the tiniest bit too small and I keep hitting the left most suggestion instead of the middle one, turning ares into aren’ts and woulds into wouldn’ts.

                I’m sure you know what I meant.

                Pretending they aren’t massively popular exactly because they make the whole thing easier and more comfortable (browsing menus you know are up to date, being able to specify allergies as much as you want, etc) would be incredibly naive.

                Is capitalism using it aa a possibility to exploit even more? Yes. Does that suck balls? Yes. But does is the tech itself shit? No.

                Capitalism enshittifies everything. Automation isn’t cursed at because the current economic system mean that the working classes will get less, and that is a bad thing. The technology isn’t. So the tech isn’t the issue. Capitalism is.

                • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  I use them only when it’s free (ie someone else is paying for it). I hate them so much. They are not more convenient, they increase the price by 100% and they actively hurt people and small businesses.

                • Noxy@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  browsing menus you know are up to date

                  A quick web search shows plenty of anecdotes to the contrary.

                  being able to specify allergies as much as you want

                  And you trust that?? If I had a serious food allergy I would absolutely NOT trust that a food delivery service would communicate those effectively given how much they push restaurants around, up to and including adding restaurants without their knowledge or consent.

                  I suppose in the strictest sense, sure, these apps are convenient, but you sure are paying a lot for it, and some restaurants charge extra for it on top of the fees, and the delivery folks aren’t getting a fair cut of the fees. Most of the fees go to big tech.

  • Aido@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Do people not immediately google “How does X make money” or is that just me?

    • Imhotep@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      It is about Honey hijacking the referrals, which wasn’t known until a youtuber made a video about it (or at least not widely known)

      • Aido@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Yes, they’ve been doing this since even before PayPal bought them. This is how they’ve always made money.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        This is why I don’t trust Brave Browser. They did this in the past. Well, I don’t know if they replaced referrals but they added them when they weren’t there.

    • johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The problem is that a lot of these startups don’t make money. The enshittification comes later, first stage is just burning through VC cash to establish market share.

    • Piemanding@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I feel like I’ve searched it up for honey, but the search results said the same thing as the YouTubers shilling it. Didn’t download it anyway because of how many people were advertising it. Anyone who uses that much money to advertise can’t be getting their money in a reasonable manner.

    • deafboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      No need to do even that. If a simple piece of software becomes a company, it’s 99% a scam.

    • viralJ@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I didn’t Google it. I just figured, if it found me a 10% discount, the vendor would also send Honey some % of what I paid for the product.

    • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I’m that cynical i just avoid anything being shilled by a YouTuber. I assume if they’re pushing it this hard it must be nefarious in some way and I spend no more time thinking about it.

      I will drop my subs for channels that shill this stuff though once it becomes evident it’s shady.

    • Snapz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      They do, but then a trusted “insider” youtuber or podcaster who they have a years long parasocial relationship with “signs off” on the product and the person says to themselves, “X person has integrity and they are very smart, they wouldn’t put their name on Y unless they did a lot of homework, so I don’t have to.”

      And life is difficult, complicated and overwhelming, so you can’t really blame “normal” folks for putting the same faith they’d put into their tech saavy nephew into these personalities. The influencers should pause though and accept that if they can’t enthusiastically describe the reason a thing is actually legitimate, they should refrain from endorsing it or accept part of the blame for misleading people.

      Fuck PayPal and its related entities and all executives past, present and future. And I guess fuck you too now, Will Ferrell - you cosigned Mel Gibson in whatever the fuck that daddy movie series was and now you’re the face of these people? The “PayPal mafia” (cringe) literally just bought the US election. I know you need to bankroll a lot of family trips to Sweden, but you h ave too much obviously dirty money now, Will. Hard to chuckle at your comedies now, and that’s a bummer.

    • limelight79@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I have, for some businesses I’ve wondered about. For example, I use the virtual cycling platform Zwift, which charges a monthly or annual fee to use. The biggest competitor, Rouvy, also charges a fee. Makes sense, it takes money to develop these things, buy and maintain servers, etc. The income and expenses are obvious. (Zwift does offer bike frames and wheels from real world brands; I assume the brands paid something to be included.)

      Enter MyWhoosh. Free to use, so the income side is unclear. From some searching, they claim they’ll generate revenue via ads - but I doubt that would generate enough to support the platform.

      The company is based out of Abu Dhabi, so I assume it’s really sportswashing - they’re just dumping a bunch of money into it and not really caring that it isn’t making money (at least for now).

      I’m sticking with Zwift (in part because I have it working under Linux and Wine).