• Noxy@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    “don’t agree with trans people” on what topic? which star trek is best? emacs vs vim? coffee vs tea?

    finish the fucking sentence, asshole

  • fidodo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    These cowards need to finish the fucking sentence. "don’t agree"with what exactly? Their right to exist?

  • stinerman@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s amazing how people in general can have no empathy for who are discriminated against even if they themselves were discriminated against.

    • TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The dissonance is uniquely human. For some reason certain people will never see themselves in others no matter how bad society has shit upon them in the past.

  • gmtom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Literally just replace “trans” with any other queer identity and see how that sound you bozo.

  • lady_maria@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I will never understand why any gay person would ever be transphobic.

    Like…??? You do understand that people have used many of the exact same arguments against trans rights as they’ve done to suppress gay rights too… right?

    • Stamets@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same way so many gay people are racist too or that you have so many classist or ableist gays. People just often don’t care about what doesn’t affect them. Hypocrisy is common as hell in humanity. We’re all guilty of it to some extent, usually though it’s very minor and in the background. But whether it’s big or small people often ignore their own hypocrisies. This shit is just blatant in the gay community. I think they do have the self-awareness of realizing the same arguments are used against them. They just don’t care.

  • drmeanfeel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The smug “stay home with MY BOYFRIEND WHO IS A BOY AND I AM A BOY” after already saying he’s gay was a real cherry on top

  • solarbabies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As a bi person who does support trans people, I dislike pride parades b/c they make us all look bad. Now what?

      • solarbabies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Edit: Let me make this make sense for the people who are so eager to downvote one of their own. Let’s say you attend an endangered whale conservation group, but data shows the group’s actions (due to a few careless individuals) have actually led to more whale deaths than it has prevented. Then your response to someone critiquing you is “then don’t join the group”? You see how that is unproductive, if not morally reprehensible?

        This condescending attitude is the same type of exclusionary BS that got us into needing pride parades in the first place, you know.

        “Don’t think like me? You’re not welcome here. We cannot accommodate a diversity of perspectives. It’s our way or the highway.”

        And liberals wonder why right wingers accuse them of being fascists.

        • paholg@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          What? You said you don’t like pride parades and the response was “don’t go then”. Not everything is for everyone.

          Do you want everyone who enjoys pride parades to change them to specifically cater to you?

          • solarbabies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Lol no. I think that agreeing on higher standards for what kind of clothing and actions are not acceptable in public parades, would go a long way toward actually helping the LGBT+ community gain acceptance rather than hurting our image.

            • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              We will never “gain acceptance” by dressing and acting the way conservatives want us to.

              Remember, these people are absolutely willing to define “being trans near children” as a sex crime. Our existence, to them, is a sick deviant perverted sex act. Two men holding hands in public is “grooming children”.

              When you draw these lines between the “acceptable queers” and everyone else, all you’re doing is putting yourself inside of a shrinking circle. That circle will eventually shrink to the point where even you, the acceptable queer, no longer fit inside it, because our entire existence is fundamentally unacceptable to them. And when that happens, there will be no one else left to stand in solidarity with you.

              • solarbabies@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                I never drew that line, you did for your strawman argument. Typical lib response tbh. I never said there are “acceptable queers” and “not acceptable queers”. I said we need to have standards for what is considered acceptable in the context of public parades.

                Conservatives are willing to define “being trans near children” as a sex crime, mostly b/c of the lies and misconceptions they get told/reinforced by conservative politicians and pastors about LGBT+, would you agree?

                And what do you think those politicians and pastors use as “evidence” that we are all sexual deviants? If you think images and photos of sexual behavior at Pride parades is not one of them, you’re mistaken. It’s a public display, and it’s easy for them to say “why aren’t these people classified as sex offenders for doing such heinous acts in public?”

                I stated a simple fact: pride parades currently hurt our image. People in this thread can’t seem to accept that.

                • radicalautonomy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  And, yet, a lot of us don’t give a shit if parades hurt our image with the cishets. Pride is for us. We could all show up wearing Mennonite clothing…overalls for mascs and androgynes and ankle length denim skirts for femmes…no flags, no banners, no music, no dancing, no PDA, no hand holding, nothing…just a bunch of queers in modest clothing going for a walk on a Saturday afternoon, and there would still be a large contingent of conservative cishets who would take offense just because we dare to exist outside.

                  The whole lot of them can get fucked.

    • SlothMama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have the same opinion. Pride parades often hurt the public image of the LGBT community. At least ban the leather fetish shit.

      • NotJustForMe@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Someone else once said that they love humans, just ban all jews.

        Leather is only a fetish because some people decided that it is. There is nothing inherently wrong with leather.

        Ban leather fetish? You are the definition of ignorance. That is what is hurting the public image. Do you also go to a rave and tell them to dress differently? All that neon clothing is hurting your eyes? Or to any demo with people dressing as unicorns?

        You underestimate the public. Who cares about leather? We care about people being ignorant dicks, about people who are obnoxious and about people who are trying to harm others. Not leather.

        There is no difference between a business suit, a nipple piercing, a mini-skirt or a gag-ball. The person wearing those are what counts.

        People trying to ban others, that’s just sad. As long as decency laws are obeyed, who are you to judge? Fetish only exists because of ignorance. Otherwise, they would be hobbies.

        • solarbabies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lmao can you even hear yourself speak?

          Try walking up to a conservative asking for their acceptance while wearing a nipple piercing, a leather strap-on and a gag ball, and see how they respond…