Have strong opinions, but I welcome any civil fact-based discussion.
Alt account: /u/BrikoX@lemmy.sdf.org
“UNABLE TO ISSUE CITATION TO COMPUTER,” say dispatch records, AZCentral writes. Arizona law does allow officers to give out tickets when a robotaxi commits a traffic violation while driving autonomously; however, officers have to give them to the company that owns the vehicle. Doing so is “not feasible,” according to a Phoenix police spokesperson quoted by trade publication Repairer Driven News earlier this year.
I guess we are getting that boat league after all.
It’s possible, but they usually tend to infiltrate NGOs, not create them and do the work. But do you have any proof?
They need a reason now to get access to the account. They just prefer to bypass the due process. Everyone is guilty until proven innocent.
The firm has not commented on the possibility of customer data exposure yet, presumably because the investigation is still in its early phase.
Not Mastodon, but mastodon.social
. All the journalist on news focused instances are excluded.
Any countries want to stop all funding until claims can be investigated, or do they prefer to stick to their double standards?
Probably one of the best sci-fi shows created in the last few decades. It’s smart, deep, and engaging. You might need to get through a few first episodes if high school drama is not your jam, but after that you will be hooked.
Obligatory 'Fuck John Deere".
All of them are considered in tandem, not individually.
Considering that OpenAI is making a commercial profit from developing its ML models
They are losing money during development (all those GPUs are not free and running them costs a lot of energy), they are making the money after it’s trained. Just factual inaccuracy.
And being used for commercial purpose is not automatic rejection. Take YouTube, where fair use comes up constantly. Almost all the cases are for commercial purpose, but most qualify under fair use.
#3 also because the model usually ingests the entire work, not just part of it.
While they are trained on full works, the used work in the result is different. Probably minimal considering the size of the models. The fact that some courts already ruled that “AI” works can’t be copyrighted gives weight to the argument that it’s a unique work.
It’s very hard to argue that “AI” generated is different from someone looking at the original and making a copy by hand. And since the latter is allowed, by the same token is the former.
Which is both sad and confusing as he pulled it out on set with the intention to pull the trigger for the scene.
It wasn’t even an actual scene being filmed, It was blocking (working out the details of an actor’s moves in relation to the camera) where non-functioning props like cardboard are usually used. The scene script in question also didn’t even have him pointing the gun. He was supposed to only draw the gun out partially.
They were one of the first to go.
I think my workplace would be more concerned about the fact that their own sex toy shopping is tracked than the fact that I use sex toys.
But I marked it as NSFW anyway.
Which part do you find NSFW?
At this point, it’s unclear what’s the extent of the incident and how many HubSpot customers were affected.
While TeamViewer states there is no evidence that its product environment or customer data has been breached, its massive use in both consumer and corporate environments makes any breach a significant concern as it would provide full access to internal networks.
Both things can be true. And in this case they are.
Checkout coffeezilla/voidzilla coverage if you haven’t seen it yet.
It would be ironic if he survived the gangs and instead got taken down by greedy CEOs.