• FMT99@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    131
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Well I’ll say two things, first the old /r/conservative would never have allowed this open of a discussion. I don’t know if these stayed up long but I remember people even going very slightly against the Fox narrative being banned.

    Also this guy, completely and utterly misguided though I believe he is, at least has the courage of his convictions. He’s willing to make a sacrifice for what he thinks is good for the country. I very much doubt he’s right but still, that’s more than most people can say.

      • YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        53
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah. The dude that came up with the term cognitive dissonance described this process in his book When Prophesy Fails. Basically when you are in a cult and your doomsday ends up being a normal day you have a freak out of cognitive dissonance. This isn’t great because people don’t like having their strongly held beliefs shown to be invalid. So they must come up with a post hoc rationalization as to why their doomsday didn’t come true and why they are still right.

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 day ago

        May also just be a troll tactic. Sowing retrofitted justification with ai. The first comment is bait.

        I honestly cant tell anymore. Dead internet theory moving fast on that site.

    • stebo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      The question remains, does “good for the country” mean good for the citizens, or good for the elite?