fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months agoIrrationalmander.xyzimagemessage-square51fedilinkarrow-up166arrow-down15
arrow-up161arrow-down1imageIrrationalmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square51fedilink
minus-squarerbits@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoIf you have three particles, 1/3 of that is one particle. No need to divide an indivisible particle.
minus-squarethemeatbridge@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoBut if I don’t have three particles, 1/3 requires division.
minus-squarerbits@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoRight, but you can have exactly a third of some group of particles. You can’t have exactly pi of some group of particles I think is what they were saying
If you have three particles, 1/3 of that is one particle. No need to divide an indivisible particle.
But if I don’t have three particles, 1/3 requires division.
Right, but you can have exactly a third of some group of particles. You can’t have exactly pi of some group of particles I think is what they were saying