• 0x0@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Ekholm attributes Ericsson’s significant network market downturn on Chinese businesses.

    So long as Chinese rivals keep selling low-priced goods, telecoms won’t be able to put much pressure on them.

    Ain’t that called free market competition and all?

      • mal3oon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        It’s more about China heavily subsidizing its tech industry, mainly to disrupt western innovations. Same thing is happening with Electrical Vehicles. Typical capitalist bait and switch.

        • themurphy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          That’s true, but it’s also true that China has prioritised to make automated factories and investing heavily in just plain better battery tech.

          I know alot of the money came from the CCP, but when the investments are done, this new tech will outperform other companies on just being better (thinking of EV specifically).

          I think I’m just saying that a state investing in tech and technologies is not a bad idea always.

  • Squizzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Huawei is at every node of next generation networks. From customer equipment to splices, to testing equipment to the complete housing in exchanges.

    I havent seen anu erricson equipment being installed outside regulatory compliance replacements of older POTS gear.