upto60percentoff

Some people receive a better education being homeschooled than what their local school system could provide. Does that mean we should abandon the school system entirely?

The worst case school is still better at teaching you then the worst case parents. Parents who aren’t in a position to teach you anything are also a lot more common than the worst case school.

My dad’s uncle works for hugh wolverine and he says he looks like that from doing 20 pushups a day

Where do you draw the line? Some people’s parents teach them reading, writing and mathematics before they even enter the school system. Does that mean the school system shouldn’t teach those three?

What if your parents don’t know how to fix a clogged sink? Or to cook food more complicated than pasta with ketchup?

What do you see as the purpose of the schooling system?

But for there to be somebody to downwardly punch, then it must be true.

There is no genocide happening.

Place your bets, people: is it willful ignorance or just denial?

Yeah gym gear like lifting gloves and gym shark leggings

That and a couple of intense workouts

His arms are VFX in pool 3 not sure about the rest

No he’s just naturally like that

Doesn’t matter. The point is that not being convicted is not synonymous with innocence. Innocence and guilt both exist outside the current iteration of the justice system.

Deliberately putting yourself in a situation you need to defend yourself using lethal force for the sake of defending yourself using lethal force is murder.

I’m a murderer whether or not I’m convicted. Murderers predate the US justice system.

Should Rittenhouse have been convicted? Probably not, because it’s not worth sacrificing the protections inbuilt to the legal system for the sake of punishing a snivelling shit weasel like Rittenhouse. That doesn’t make him innocent though.

OJ Simpson also wasn’t convicted.

It seems kind of obvious Rittenhouse went looking for a situation he could put himself in so that he could shoot somebody. That’s murder if you can prove it, but good luck proving it.

The US military HAS a method of distinguishing “delisting for reason A” from “delisting for reason B”, but they’re all coming up as false positives for The Rock’s endorsement? That seems a touch unlikely.

You’re suggesting ONLY 38 people total delisted during the total length of the promotion? Those are incredibly low numbers.

The act of inserting this context into the system is itself context, so I’m still existing in the context of what came before

If somebody tricks you and you fall for it, it doesn’t mean what you were tricked into believing isn’t context, or that the fact you were tricked at all isnt context.

Yeah they’re going to cast like the highest paid actor in the world and then not show his face

Removed by mod

Memories being given as an input to the system are themselves context

I’m trying to figure out if you’ve convinced yourself of this or if you’re just trying to avoid appearing wrong on the internet. Utterly fascinating.

For reference, demand would very obviously be a synonym of ask in this case.

If you pointedly and repeatedly demand which alternate candidate somebody canvassed for, then one of three things is true:

• You don’t think an alternate candidate exists
• You think somebody needs to canvas to hold an opinion
• You think there is an alternate candidate, but are just being difficult for the sake of it

Why bother pretending otherwise?

The point being that you went from not believing anybody else could do the job to believing in Harris because it turns out that if somebody isn’t campaigning then they don’t seem a viable candidate?