• TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    17 hours ago

    26 episode seasons were way way better. 10 episode seasons don’t give enough time to develop characters and have less plot driven episodes.

    • Skavau@lemm.eeOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Depends on the TV series purpose. Many episodes in 26 episode seasons weren’t plot-driven as such, as the episode was entirely self-contained and could be skipped without missing anything related to the wider arc

      • gila@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        The same can be said for many episodes in 10-episode seasons, and due to that constraint those examples are more disruptive to plot progression and tend to be counterbalanced with episodes which rush progression but aren’t actually good.

          • gila@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I think most series are constrained to their respective runtimes and while those constraints do shape the nature of the themes they have the capacity to explore, it isn’t always a problem even for series with fewer than 10 episodes. I haven’t watched either of those recently enough to speak on them, but I think 10-episode series have become a de facto standard that is problematic for many shows and seasons. Severance S2 and The Bear S3 come to mind as recent examples. Both tend to experiment with the form of episodic storytelling in a way which, while interesting and worthwhile in my opinion, ultimately serves to make their respective season arcs less cohesive as a direct result of that constraint.