Most sophisticated Isra*li propagandist

  • ☭CommieWolf☆@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Again, you’re just implying that time frame has any bearing on genocide. When this isn’t true, not by any definition of genocide. Sabra and Shatila was a genocidal massacre that took place over just 48 hours. Does it stop being genocidal because of how little time it took? What if they did it faster? Would they get away with it then? I don’t see any meaning in assigning time limits to genocide.

    • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Again, you’re just implying that time frame has any bearing on genocide.

      No, I’m not actually. My comment was about how it does not.

      • ☭CommieWolf☆@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m not sure I’d go so far as to call it genocide (in my mind you need a sustained effort over a longer time frame than that)

        Maybe I’m misunderstanding what this means, but it reads to me like you’re saying that for it to count as genocide that it needs to span over a certain time frame, am I misconstruing this? Are you of the mind that it should count as 2 separate genocides if the nuclear bombs dropped more than a few days apart from each other? This is a very strange point.

        • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Frankly comrade I have no idea what you’re talking about or how you could possibly have derived what is in this comment from any of my comments, so I’m simply going to disengage.