The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 12 days agoHow convenient!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square183linkfedilinkarrow-up11.49Karrow-down18
arrow-up11.49Karrow-down1imageHow convenient!lemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 12 days agomessage-square183linkfedilink
minus-squareRisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·11 days agoIsn’t Synology having issues because they expect you to use specifically their drives?
minus-squared15d@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·11 days agoYes, apparently they remove features if you don’t use synology-branded drives. https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/nas/synology-requires-self-branded-drives-for-some-consumer-nas-systems-drops-full-functionality-and-support-for-third-party-hdds
minus-square418_im_a_teapot@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 days agoNa. It just shows a warning, but it doesn’t have any effect. Annoying, but not enough to change my mind about them. I’ve got two units and both have been rock solid.
Isn’t Synology having issues because they expect you to use specifically their drives?
Yes, apparently they remove features if you don’t use synology-branded drives.
https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/nas/synology-requires-self-branded-drives-for-some-consumer-nas-systems-drops-full-functionality-and-support-for-third-party-hdds
Na. It just shows a warning, but it doesn’t have any effect. Annoying, but not enough to change my mind about them. I’ve got two units and both have been rock solid.