Although Kremlin strike planners probably didn’t intend to hit a NATO member, Romania’s military launched F-16s fighters and said it would investigate.

A Russian kamikaze drone on Wednesday flew into NATO air space and detonated near a Romanian village, Ukrainian news reports said, but official Bucharest said the fact of the strike wasn’t confirmed and that they would check.

Ukrainian social media video recorded in the river port city of Izmail, opposite Plaura, showed an orange flash lighting up the night horizon and a booming blast on the Romanian side of the river. Flames and smoke reaching hundreds of meters into the sky were visible following the explosion. A Russian kamikaze drone strike against Izmail had been in progress at the time.

    • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
      43·
      4 months ago

      If that is true then Ukraine had zero chance of winning. So then considering that, you are in favor of using the deaths of tens of thousands of dead Ukrainian soldiers and civilians to mildly harm the Russian military?

      • legion02@lemmy.world
        53·
        4 months ago

        First Georgia now Ukraine. It’s time for the world make it known that shit ain’t gonna fly.

        • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
          22·
          4 months ago

          So that is a yes, you want Ukrainians to die for a narative that is not proven and doesnt seem logical?

          • legion02@lemmy.world
            21·
            4 months ago

            Ukrainians are already dying because Russia is attempting to invade their country. Wtf?

            • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
              23·
              4 months ago

              Apparently you are not aware that the war could have ended two years ago but Boris Johnson flew in and offered them weapons to keep fighting. What your logic seems to be saying is - you are in favor of giving weapons to Ukraine so they can fight and weaken Russia, but they never had a chance of winning because Russia is strong enough to semi-replicate what Nazi germany did. So you are willing to sacrifice tens of thousands of Ukrainians to weaken Russia. What part about this is not what you believe?

                • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                  21·
                  4 months ago

                  Cool, that is not what we are talking about right now.

                  What your logic seems to be saying is - you are in favor of giving weapons to Ukraine so they can fight and weaken Russia, but they never had a chance of winning because Russia is strong enough to semi-replicate what Nazi germany did. So you are willing to sacrifice tens of thousands of Ukrainians to weaken Russia. What part about this is not what you believe?

                  • davel@lemmy.mlEnglish
                    3·
                    4 months ago

                    Russia is strong, but not nearly strong enough to “semi-replicate” what Nazi Germany did, not that it really matters since Russia has no interest in replicating it.

                  • legion02@lemmy.world
                    22·
                    4 months ago

                    I’m in favor of giving Ukraine weapons so they can defend themselves. You trying to put statements in my mouth because what I’m actually saying is inconvenient for you changes nothing.