db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 个月前PSAlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square29linkfedilinkarrow-up197arrow-down166
arrow-up131arrow-down1imagePSAlemmy.dbzer0.comdb0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 个月前message-square29linkfedilink
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down1·1 个月前Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
minus-squareNSRXN@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down4·1 个月前 Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism you’re making that up
minus-squareNSRXN@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down5·edit-21 个月前stating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism
Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
you’re making that up
stating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism