not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to FuckMusk@lemmy.caEnglish · 2 months agoso much more expensive for the tax payer toolemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square69linkfedilinkarrow-up1739arrow-down137file-text
arrow-up1702arrow-down1imageso much more expensive for the tax payer toolemmy.blahaj.zonenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to FuckMusk@lemmy.caEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square69linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareZron@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down3·2 months agoHow is it reusable if they all fail?
minus-squareatx_aquarian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoNot pictured (that’s called cherry-picking): Falcon 9 has 469 successful launches for a >99% success rate right now.
minus-squareZron@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoFalcon 9 was designed by a different engineer who has since left SpaceX, and was originally intended to have a reusable second stage like Starship, but that never happened either.
minus-squareDogWater@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 months agoJust Google it before you speak lmao
How is it reusable if they all fail?
Not pictured (that’s called cherry-picking): Falcon 9 has 469 successful launches for a >99% success rate right now.
Falcon 9 was designed by a different engineer who has since left SpaceX, and was originally intended to have a reusable second stage like Starship, but that never happened either.
Just Google it before you speak lmao