• Red_sun_in_the_sky [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Wtf. Yeah right they will take over the river of which the upper stream is already in tibet. Whoa they have grab this land to stop the water to go downstream, mind = blown.

    • Hello_Kitty_enjoyer [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah right they will take over the river of which the upper stream is already in tibet.

      look at a globe, cracker

      the river does not originate in Tibet, 90% of it originates in the mountains of Arunachal

      • Red_sun_in_the_sky [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        You are a dumbass. Jesus. The upper tract is tsangpo. Only breaking thorough arunachal as siang and then meeting dibang and lohit from assam Brahmaputra is formed. Then further it would go on to meghna.

        Maybe you should look at a map

        look at a globe cracker

        சும்மா ஒலராத வாய மூடு

            • Hello_Kitty_enjoyer [none/use name]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              you literally can’t keep track of the argument lmao. done

              the original argument was “losing arunachal = water insecurity”

              you countered with “uhhh the tsangpo is acktshyually in Tibet” and ignored the massive amounts of water (snow) from Arunachal itself

              somehow you can’t admit that you’re wrong, or you can’t keep track of what was said 4 comments ago

              Hint: wanna actually disprove what I said? look at the volume flow rates for all those rivers on your map, and show me that a large amount of it originates from before it hits Arunachal

              • Red_sun_in_the_sky [any]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                I was not even arguing dumb mf. That was you. You are the daft mf who keeps saying how taking arunachal will help china control Brahmaputra. Which is dumb af considering they can divert the upper stream. You on the other hand keep insisting that arunachal is the focal point where the river starts and therefore its being grabbed by china.

                Now you are just saying uhhh you can’t remember what was said, Oh I do.

                Idc care to disprove to obtuse mf who doesn’t understand shit.

                Keep dreaming. No ones genuinely buys that siang just pops out arunachal. Not even India or Bangladesh. That’s why the outcry is still about diverting tsangpo with dams as china builds em. You keep living in whatever delusion that you got going.

                மூளை இருந்தா யோசி பாக்கலாம்

                • Hello_Kitty_enjoyer [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  You on the other hand keep insisting that arunachal is the focal point where the river starts and therefore its being grabbed by china.

                  Never said this, come up with more interesting headcanon

                  No ones genuinely buys that siang just pops out arunachal.

                  Again, never said this. the point is that losing control of 90% of your water supply is a lot worse than the current situation of not controlling 10% of it. Numbers!