• squaresinger@lemmy.worldEnglish
    21·
    3 days ago

    To be honest, it’s a wrong argument anyways. The cyclist was aware of the pedestrian on the bike lane and he stopped in time. So the whole argument doesn’t matter.

    The actual point is whether the pedestrian was in the right to wander onto the bike lane, completely oblivious to his surroundings.

    • _stranger_@lemmy.worldEnglish
      11·
      3 days ago

      They were both in the wrong. The cyclist shouldn’t be entitled to being an asshole because they’re inconvenienced, and the pedestrian doesn’t get to wander in the bike lane unaware of their surroundings.