Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youāll near-instantly regret.
Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.
If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutānāpaste it into its own post ā thereās no quota for posting and the bar really isnāt that high.
The post Xitter web has spawned soo many āesotericā right wing freaks, but thereās no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iām talking redscare-ish, reality challenged āculture criticsā who write about everything but understand nothing. Iām talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyāre inescapable at this point, yet I donāt see them mocked (as much as they should be)
Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnāt be surgeons because they didnāt believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canāt escape them, I would love to sneer at them.
(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this. Also, happy 4th July in advanceā¦I guess.)
Unethical though?
Iām not shedding any tears for the companies that failed to do their due dilligence in hiring, especially not ones involved in AI (seems most were) and involved with Y Combinator.
That said, unless you want to get into a critique of capitalism itself, or start getting into whataboutism regarding celebrity executives like a number of the HN comments do, I donāt have many qualms calling this sort of thing unethical.
This whole thing is flying way too close to the "not debate club" rule for my comfort already, but I wrote it so I may as well post it
Multiple jobs at a time, or not giving 100% for your full scheduled hours is an entirely different beast than playing some game of āIām going to get hired at literally as many places as possible, lie to all of them, not do any actual work at all, and then see how long I can draw a paycheck while doing nothingā.
Like, get that bag, but ew. Itās a matter of intent and of scale.
I canāt find anything indicating that the guy actually provided anything of value in exchange for the paychecks. Ostensibly, employment is meant to be a value exchange.
Most critically for me: I canāt help but hurt some for all the people on teams screwed over by this. Iāve been in too many situations where even getting a single extra pair of hands on a team was a heroic feat. Iāve seen the kind of effects it has on a team tthatās trying not to drown when the extra bucket to bail out the water is instead just another hole drilled into the bottom of the boat. That sort of situation led directly to my own burnout, which Iām still not completely recovered from nearly half a decade later.
Call my opinion crab bucketing if you like, but we all live in this capitalist framework, and actions like this have human consequences, not just consequences on the CEOās yearly bonus.
Nah, I feel you. I think this is pretty solidly a āplague on both their housesā kind of situation. Iām glad he chose to focus his apparently amazing grift powers on such a deserving target, but letās not pretend that anything whatsoever was really gained here.
source? (jk jk jk)
Not doing your due dilligence during recruitment is stupid, but exploiting that is still unethical, unless you can make a case for all of those companies being evil.
Like if he directly scammed idk just OpenAI, Palantir, and Amazon then sure, he canāt possibly use that money for any worse purposes.