Editorial from the Libertarian Socialist Caucus attacking the appearance of Teamster president Sean O'Brien at the recent Republican National Convention. by Jesse M. Like everyone on the Left, I see no difference between the Democrats and Republicans, so I have no problem with Teamster president Sean O’Brien speaking to the Republican National Convention. Just kidding!...
  • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    0·
    1 month ago

    This seems more like an article taking issue with how O’Brien referenced something by Hawley that resonates with the GOP when calling them out for not supporting labor.

    While there were some cathartic moments in O’Brien’s speech, where he lambasts Republicans for not supporting workers, it seems like a part of a larger project of his to try to create some sort of “pro-labor conservative.”

    I think the first part is accurate and the only part that mattered. If there is a ‘pro-labor conservative’ that speech was about how it is not in the GOP right now.

    • Sop@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      0·
      1 month ago

      A conservative because you probably don’t live in a communist country which means that workers are being stolen from which means that the laws aren’t as pro labour as you describe them to be.

      • blaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.io
        0·
        1 month ago

        Certainly they could be better, but the fight now is with the “right” trying to make them worse, which is what I wish wouldn’t happen.

        I guess my intention was to point that “Conservative” is a relative position.

        • Sop@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          0·
          1 month ago

          Sure, it’s a term relative to time and place. Are people that want to preserve labour rights called conservatives in your country?

          In most places in the West conservatives don’t really want to preserve the status quo, they’re often reactionary and want to go ‘back’ to a previous (or imaginary) status quo

          • blaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.io
            0·
            1 month ago

            You are completely right, but in these cases the proper name, I think, would be Reactionary, as you said, or Retrograde.

            And Stagnantive should also be a separate category.

  • tmcgh@lemm.ee
    0·
    1 month ago

    I have family that would claim they are pro-labor, keyword claim. One family member was in a union for his entire working career. Him and his spouse vote conservative (afaik) everytime. I’ve tried to explain that they are voting against what helped them get to the point they are at currently but they just can’t see it. It has helped some that now I’m in a union but even when agreeing with me that corporations only care about profits and will cut you and your benefits the first chance they get, they will still side with R. It’s crazy! We even had an interesting conversation about trickle down economics and how it hasn’t worled or trickled down at all. I was surprised they agreed with me on that.

    • lordnikon@lemmy.worldEnglish
      0·
      1 month ago

      It’s because it stopped being about representation and starter being about identity and being in the in group. Whenever that happens they don’t mind being ruled as long as they stay in the in group and by the time they are in the out group. It’s already too late.