• Bell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 month ago

    Thank you for finding and reviewing any sort of Google Photos alternative. I’d like to de-Google and this is one of the pieces.

            • Kairos@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              15
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Docker is probably nice to use, but it’s UI is just so goddamn auful for something that other people think everyone is instantly able to pick up. The massive disconnect between containers, images, instances, or whatever near-synonym that the UI expects you to know, and what they actually do is astounding.

              I still have ZERO goddamn idea which port is internal or external in the -p 80:80 option because every single fucking guide just has it there and expects you to just magically know which one is what and EVERY LAST ONE just uses the same internal and external port. And good fucking luck looking it up and getting even vaguely relevant results (I’ve tried)

              So when something says “oh just use docker-compose …” I groan because I have not one fucking idea what actually happens. Does that create a container? Or an image? Or instance? Which one of those is the template and which one of those is the running code which is identified by a completely meaningless hexadecimal string?

              Also how do I back them up? Do I also have to back up EVERYTHING in the container? What if I just want to back up the database? How would I pass through a folder on an external drive? Or do I have to duplicate the hundreds of gigabytes of photos I have for just this container? Are those included in backups if backups are even a thing? What if I can’t store all that on my boot drive? Am I able to move JUST that single container or image or whatever the fuck?

              There’s a reason I like running things on bare metal. It’s plenty secure if it’s just for you and also behind additional authentication and put it in its own user like I do. It just fucking works.

              • fluxc0@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                19
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                okay hear me out: what if you took the time to learn it and learn how it works. literally all of your gripes are solvable one way or another. your ignorance fuels your hatred.

        • 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Cleaner how? Systemd services can already provide basically all of the isolation features you could want if that’s what you’re talking about. It’s got namespaces, chroot+bind mounts, per-service dynamically allocated users, syscall filter, capability filter, and so on.

          Docker adds a lot of for most uses unnecessary complexity (a huge part of which being the networking). This also sometimes causes problems, for example it messes with netfilter tables which works fine most of the time but can actually do unwanted things like IIRC open ports you didn’t expect to be open because you didn’t open them in your firewall. There’s also how if you use prebuilt images (which you probably do) you’re at the mercy of everyone whose containers you’re using to provide security updates in time.

          Of course there’s cases where you actually want something like docker (multi-machine orchestration, spinning up multiple of the same container dynamically depending on load, running people’s arbitrary build environments like in GitHub Actions are a few examples) but a lot of times when people are pushing it it really seems like cargo cult mentality.

  • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Pretty short and lacking of details to be considered a proper review, IMO. It doesn’t show any UX, go over all the functionality, etc. Good to see that it’s fully open sourced and E2EE though.

    I’ve been thinking recently about a proton drive subscription. I’m still leaving towards that, but I’ll look into this too

    • myliltoehurts@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Just a warning: the photo part of proton drive is incredibly basic to be generous and even that doesn’t seem to work smoothly (on android). Just to handpick 2 very annoying things aside from lack of features: opening a picture that’s locally on your phone takes 1-2 seconds, and when you back out it has to refresh the gallery view every time, which also takes 1-2 seconds - incredibly annoying while looking for the correct picture.

      I use it as a second type of backup for my photos, but I definitely couldn’t live with the UX the app provides. IMO the drive part in general is very lacking.

      I’m still happy with my proton subscription for mail and VPN, but I’d suggest you trial the drive part before committing to it (unless you already know it’s ok for your needs, in which case great!).

    • jlwtformer@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m not paid at all. This was just my thoughts about the service. I’m going to add more to it since it being short seems to be a common comment.

    • Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      The review was short but interesting.

      I feel like we (people on Lemmy) have to be more open to people taking the time to review something, even if it ain’t as good as what you could get from some professionals.

      I ‘m gonna have a look at this to see if it could work with the 2tb of storage I have on my kDrive (by infomaniak) account.