• someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    It is literally explicitly about diabetes. Diabetes tends to overlap with obesity and they talk about it a bit, but it is literally explicitly about diabetes. The study if you follow the links is “Type 2 diabetes: etiology and reversibility”.

    And yes I gave the results that they found. Why are you acting like that’s bad?

    Messaging? Sure we can criticize click bait headlines, but sorry to say you are the one that jumped to 40 year old products and conflated them. And I’m the one saying don’t do that. I think I’m out of this conversation. I think I’ve explained it well enough.

    • Carnelian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m genuinely amazed that the hill you chose to die on is whether or not the weight loss studies, that specifically targeted obese patients, which measured their results in weight loss, with the stated goal of reversing diabetes via addressing obesity, are in fact about addressing obesity.

      Studies, btw, not study. Lots of interesting stuff in this article if you actually bother to read it. Some of them even have obesity in the title, if that’s really the only important thing to you.

      Anyway, your continued refusal to answer the question you are directly being asked is noted, as is your repetition of the false assertions I have already addressed. I wholeheartedly support your initiative to leave this conversation. Cheers