• EnderMB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    IMO C# is at the point where Java can probably just die. I don’t see a point in keeping Java when C# is a viable option in many use cases.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m sure Microsoft will be happy to know their EEE strategy is finally paying off, only two decades late.

      • EnderMB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s attitudes like this that made me choose C# as the language I wanted to use professionally after graduation.

        Having grown up in the Slashdot era where people would be childish, post about Micro$oft, and parrot EEE, all while the .NET Foundation consistently put out great tooling with a mature community that actively wanted to help you learn the language/framework, the choice was simple.

    • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t think this line of reasoning is strictly speaking correct, but assuming it was, then I think it would follow that Kotlin exists and as such C# does not need to be kept around.

    • audiomodder@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Compiled Java is still cross-platform. It’s been a few years for me, but when I last worked in C# it was a giant PITA to work on it in Linux or MacOS. I hope it’s gotten better.