• rah@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Zoos act as promotional centers for conservation.

    But they aren’t necessary for conservation. Conservation can occur without zoos.

    • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I love when people like you suddenly come up with a hot take that absolutely no one has ever thought through ever in the past hundreds of years.

    • Liz@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yes, but conservation is not a binary condition. Zoos are responsible for more conservation than we would otherwise have without them.

      • rah@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        So you acknowledge that zoos are not necessary for conservation?

        • Liz@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Not in a binary sense, no. Such thinking isn’t useful, however. Zoos are a very strong net good fot animals, with minimal downsides (assuming the zoo keepers aren’t calloused assholes).