• BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    And the fact the Soviets practiced a scorched-earth policy as they retreated back to Leningrad, burning their crops fields and such. It prevented the Nazis from eating it, but didn’t leave the Soviets much either.

    Just horrific all around. Weren’t there stories about residents resorting to eating dirt after all the rats had either been killed or fled the city, but before cannibalism?

    • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      And the fact the Soviets practiced a scorched-earth policy as they retreated back to Leningrad

      Scorched earth is more of a metaphor in this context, burning a field in winter is impractical. Rather it meant destroying livestock/infrastructure that couldn’t be transported away from enemy lines, rails, power lines, mines, power plants, tractors, etc.

      This probably didn’t impact the famine inside the city as anything that could be transported into the city or further behind soviet lines was, and anything that couldn’t would have been used by the nazis and certainly not given to the people in the city if it wasn’t destroyed.

      Weren’t there stories about residents resorting to eating dirt

      This is common in other famines, it’s probably accurate