• damium@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    Right image, but under those each one below would also be wearing large pants covering each side of the subtree.

  • Darkraisisi@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Look at this guy not putting on pants because HIS last branch (toes) prevents him. You think the cops will believe that story?

  • Taako_Tuesday@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    It definitely wouldn’t be the left image. With legs like those, you could never pull the pants up past the first (or I guess technically last) level of branching. It would either be the big pants or a large number of seperate, smaller pants on each of the lowest branches.

    • lugal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Have you ever seen a binary tree grow? Maybe they put the pants on each level while it is the lowest one before the next level grows

    • Tyoda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      If the pants are stretchy they could fit one of the lowest (already pantsd) branches in each leg of the jeans, and easily pull it up. You need bigger and stretchier pants as you go up the tree, though.