• damium@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Right image, but under those each one below would also be wearing large pants covering each side of the subtree.

  • Darkraisisi@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Look at this guy not putting on pants because HIS last branch (toes) prevents him. You think the cops will believe that story?

  • Taako_Tuesday@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It definitely wouldn’t be the left image. With legs like those, you could never pull the pants up past the first (or I guess technically last) level of branching. It would either be the big pants or a large number of seperate, smaller pants on each of the lowest branches.