• simple@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Most of the reviews I’ve seen so far are a bit lukewarm. Performance and bettery is good, but they’re barely better than what Intel and AMD offer. They promised 20+ hours battery life, we get around 12-13 which is in line with other chips.

    The screenshots in the article are from Dave2D’s video which compared gaming laptops to the X Elite. Laptops without a dedicated GPU could outperform it in battery, and are usually cheaper. Not to mention the new generation of chips are reportedly way more efficient. Kind of underwhelming.

    • golli@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Performance and bettery is good, but they’re barely better than what Intel and AMD offer.

      And both AMD and Intel have pretty exciting new architectures coming soon with zen5 and lunar lake.

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think people believe that the ARM ISA brings a power efficient design but what really made Apple able to sip power on the M1 was a decade of phone processor design experience and full control of the software stack.

      • simple@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        The people working on Snapdragon X Elite are supposedly the same people that worked on the M1 and M2 chips. They made their own company to make ARM chips before being acquired by qualcomm. I was hoping for similar gains…

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          …but you’ve got Microsoft writing the OS.

          Power draw is not all hardware.