I think a little clarification is needed. No. I don’t actually think everyone there is insane. I don’t care about the bans so stop trying to use that. HB enthusiasts coming here and trying to call me out achieves nothing besides proving my point

Edit: Feel free to keep trying to brigade me. It’s not going to scare me to take this down

  • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    The fact that you think that thread full of putin propaganda speaks in defense of your side is hilarious.

    • mathemachristian[he]@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      More the fact that they got detailed replies but their best counter in that whole thread where the two replies where they quickly google some shit and paste the first results and provided no thoughts of their own.

      • m_f@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        Those replies are terrible. The one with all the news headlines is peak hexbear. “Ukraine isn’t a utopia, therefore it’s a dystopia”. It’s a classic example of black and white thinking, while they conveniently ignore all of the Zwastikas on the side they’re cheering for.

        • mathemachristian[he]@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          “Ukraine isn’t a utopia, therefore it’s a dystopia”.

          What?

          More to the point, OPs replies were worse or non-existent. If you are going to bring up the ukraine war in a forum that is known to be on the other side of your argument you should have a better explanation than “Putin wants to revive the USSR” or at least something to back it up. Or at least engage the people trying to explain their viewpoints.

          • m_f@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            2 months ago

            “Ukraine isn’t a utopia, therefore it’s a dystopia”.

            That collection of news headlines are trying to imply “Ukraine isn’t perfect, therefore Putin’s invasion is justified because Ukraine is full Nazi and also the western media is trying to cover it up!”. It’s an immature view of the world, where something being imperfect means it’s literally hitler. It’s something you get past as you grow up, for the most part. I know some adult tankies IRL so it’s not a given that people grow out of it, but each and every single one of them suffers from black and white thinking that negatively impacts their life in many ways.

            Let’s agree that Putin wanting to bring back the USSR is silly. I’m not really defending OP, but calling the responses in that thread “detailed replies” is… oof. They’re detailed in the same way Time Cube is detailed. OP wandered into the pig sty and got muddy, but at least he’s not one of the pigs wallowing in the mud.

            • EABOD25@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Just saw this comment. Yes it was silly, and in no way meant to be taken literal. Looking at the history of those states that were under the USSR, putin is trying to keep control of them

            • mathemachristian[he]@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              2 months ago

              They’re detailed, they’re sourced and they give a coherent explanation. You can call them crock or whatever but it’s something you can actually argue against. None of this applies to the responses OP gave.

              Also you’re really not understanding what is being said about the nazis in ukraine, namely that they are in power and control of the military. Which is an argument Im not gonna get into since I don’t know enough about it, but there is more to it than the "ukraine is imperfect because it has nazis and this is enough justification case closed. " argument you claim is being put forth.

              • m_f@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                2 months ago

                The majority of responses are of this ilk:

                WHAT ABOUT ISM MUCH!!!111?!?1;1!?;1!1?1!1!11?1?1?!1!1?1?1?1!1!!1!1!1?1?1??1!1!1!11!?1?1!1?1?1

                <custom ukraine flag emoji> had no business being nazi fucks murdering their own people and working for <custom us flag emoji> to provoke Russia

                Obomba had no business overthrowing the democratically elected Viktor Yakunovich

                They’re not detailed, sourced, or coherent, they’re just bandwagoning. They’re pigs wallowing in the mud, enjoying getting others muddy.

                One response has images like this and links to news articles:

                It is sourced, I’ll give you that. It doesn’t try to actually make any argument though, it’s just hoping you’ll see the headlines that think “ukraine == nazis”, without stating that outright. It’s oddly similar to Young Earth Creationists.

                Here’s another response that’s the sort of thing you write when you first learn “omg capitalism is bad you guys!” and view all of the world’s ills through that lens. much dialect wow:

                Anyone who had a look at Lenin’s “Imperialism: highest stage of capitalism” and took it seriously, knew that there would be war in Europe as soon as they realized that the means of production of the former USSR were auctioned in a corrupt fashion, and their structure of ownership went not to western hands, but to national interests that collide with those of the US. Since that moment, it was just a matter of time that there would be conflict.

                Poor oppressed Putin!

                Putin tried really had to be taken into the fold imperialism. He assisted the west in its looting of Russia. He tried to join NATO but the crypto fascists who run NATO will never forgive the Slavic peoples for destroying the third reich

                I’ve waded through the responses now to make sure I’m not missing something worthwhile, and it was a waste of my time. The one thing of value any of these responses has is hopefully one day making the posters feel self cringe when they’ve matured.

                • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  The majority of responses are of this ilk

                  Right so some sarcastic little jokes. The kind of thing all over Lemmy.

                  It is sourced, I’ll give you that. It doesn’t try to actually make any argument though, it’s just hoping you’ll see the headlines that think “ukraine == nazis”, without stating that outright. It’s oddly similar to Young Earth Creationists.

                  The obvious meaning of that picture is to criticize the about-face of Western media when it comes to Ukrainian far-right movements. The narrative changed immediately. You’re meant to ask why.

                  It does not mean “Ukraine == Nazis”. This is your invention.

                  Here’s another response that’s the sort of thing you write when you first learn “omg capitalism is bad you guys!” and view all of the world’s ills through that lens. much dialect wow

                  The term is “dialectic”. Are you sure you are familiar with the topic you are being condescending about?

                  Anyone who had a look at Lenin’s “Imperialism: highest stage of capitalism” and took it seriously, knew that there would be war in Europe as soon as they realized that the means of production of the former USSR were auctioned in a corrupt fashion, and their structure of ownership went not to western hands, but to national interests that collide with those of the US. Since that moment, it was just a matter of time that there would be conflict.

                  Poor oppressed Putin!

                  A sentiment found nowhere in the statement you quoted. In fact, it is exactly the opposite of focusing on the political leader of the country and instead focuses on the material conditions of the former USSR (which is more than the aRussian Federation).

                  I’ve waded through the responses now to make sure I’m not missing something worthwhile, and it was a waste of my time.

                  Of course you are free to decide what is worth your time, but your criticisms here have been specious.

                  • m_f@midwest.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    The term is “dialectic”. Are you sure you are familiar with the topic you are being condescending about?

                    This is a great example of the hyperfocus on irrelevant details that plagues these comments. It was intentional, but even if it wasn’t, so what? “Your argument has a typo, therefore you’re dunked!”?

                    You’re meant to ask why.

                    The issue is that the comment is pablum. It doesn’t actual say anything, it’s not informative. It’s hoping you’ll infer something yourself and then waste time assuming what they meant. As mentioned in a previous comment, I realize that one of the things it’s trying to get you to infer is that decadent western media is bad or whatever, but it’s not limited to that. Arguing that there’s only one thing it’s trying to communicate is a great example of the black and white thinking that plagues tankies.

                    “You’re meant to ask why” is so embarrassingly vapid that I’m surprised you’re defending it. Of course people will focus on big issues like “let’s try to make sure this country continues to exist” over “let’s try to help this country improve itself”. There will hopefully be time for more of that later after Putin’s invasion fails. I mean come on, this is pretty basic stuff. Do you think I’d be arguing in good faith if I said “Yeah, what’s happening in Palestine is bad, but have you seen their LGBTQ record”? It’s also again, not saying something, it’s just JAQing off.

                    Right so some sarcastic little jokes. The kind of thing all over Lemmy.

                    I was told there’d be informative comments with sources. There were not. The vast majority of the comments didn’t even try to be substantive, just pigs wallowing in mud.

                    A sentiment found nowhere in the statement you quoted

                    I elided some of the comment that makes it more clear:

                    After getting teased and given the run around for decades he slowly wised up to the game. Putin realized by 2014 they wouldn’t let him be a European but until late 2023 he still didn’t understand that the west could never be trusted.

                    This is imperialist sympathizing, and the OP should feel ashamed. “Putin just had to invade Ukraine because of those other meanie imperialists that didn’t want him in their club!”

                    Also “crypto fascists who run NATO will never forgive the Slavic peoples for destroying the third reich” is just straight facepalm material.

                • mathemachristian[he]@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  My point was that there was much more good faith discussion from hexbear than from OP, I think the posts you copied here illustrate that nicely.

                  Also

                  Poor oppressed Putin!

                  shows how little you understand these arguments, the argument you post after that is meant to illustrate how Putin is an oppressor, not a oppressed or a speaker of the oppressed.

        • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Zwastikas

          There’s like a concerning amount of actual swastikas (among other charming symbols) on the guys carrying US weapons though

      • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        And here it is again, the nuanced thinkers with their thoughtful replies. What would we do without such enrichment? How would we survive?

        Fuck off, moron.