• Boomkop3@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    life does actually auto balance, even in humans. Ever noticed countries with higher child mortality rates having higher birth rates too? Other animals have similar behaviours

        • LemmysMum@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          The sun is part of our closed system. It won’t last forever, and without it no life will survive, and even if it does, the remaining resources needed to survive are fundamentally limited on the scale of eternity.

          • ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The assumption of the infinite is not an axiom of life but of the philosophical principle of Will. Which is fine if you embrace paradox and assume a will that is sufficiently exercised can live forever - and I see how biology could become a model for such an idea. But it’s not intrinsic in biology. That said, the idea of infinite repetition or perpetuation of the finite is no problem at least from a Nietzschean perspective…

  • xor@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    all of life has dying built in… that’s a pretty big limit to your limitless growth….

    in an ecosystem when a population doesn’t balance, that’s called a plague and it kills themselves and everything else.

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lol, edgy OP thinks they’re smarter than everyone else, when their wrong meme is just… lame.

    • Rotten_potato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s certainly a lot of group think happening on Lemmy which makes some threads a bit boring so I applaud the OP for daring to post their (bad, misguided, unfunny) meme regardless of its (lack of) quality.

  • lugal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Many capitalist models depend on exponential growth. That doesn’t exist in nature (I think to even in cancer so I too disagree with the original meme on some level but agree with the overall notion)

    What is very common in biology is logistic growth, or the “S curve”. It starts like an exponential function, looks almost linear in the middle and approaches a maximum at the end.

    You can model it as an exponential curve if you’re only interested in the beginning but to extrapolate it further is just wrong.

    Take lily in a pond. It might double each day for a while, but will slow down eventually. When it covers half the area at one day, it won’t cover it all the next. At that point, it takes as long to cover everything except what it did at the start, as it took to cover half the pond from the start (approximately of cause).

    Economic models often don’t take this into account but just assume exponential growth which is wrong and not found in biology.

  • ElectricCattleman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I really roll my eyes about the “dismantle the capitalist system because food costs money” memes. Like dude, dismantle it to what? Do you think no one starves when there’s no capitalism?

  • LemmysMum@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wonder how many of the downvotes think ‘Reductio ad absurdum’ is a spell from Harry Potter and not a Latin philosophical phrase.