Centurion@lemmy.world to Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.world · edit-219 hours agoIt could have been so easy lemmy.worldimagemessage-square40fedilinkarrow-up1363arrow-down130
arrow-up1333arrow-down1imageIt could have been so easy lemmy.worldCenturion@lemmy.world to Funny: Home of the Haha@lemmy.world · edit-219 hours agomessage-square40fedilink
minus-squareradicalautonomy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-213 hours agox = arcsin(nk-1) + z(2*pi), such that z is any integer.
minus-squareoberstoffensichtlich@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·edit-214 hours agoLooks correct. However it’s only valid for n ≠ 0. B
minus-squareaffiliate@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·12 hours agoif n = 0 then k = ∞ and just about any value of x works in this case. however x = arcsin(nk -1) still doesn’t work since 0 * ∞ is not defined. so i think the B grade is fair. (this is all assuming we’re working on the riemann sphere)
arcsin(nk-1) ?
x = arcsin(nk-1) + z(2*pi), such that z is any integer.
Looks correct. However it’s only valid for n ≠ 0.
B
if n = 0 then k = ∞ and just about any value of x works in this case. however x = arcsin(nk -1) still doesn’t work since 0 * ∞ is not defined. so i think the B grade is fair.
(this is all assuming we’re working on the riemann sphere)
deleted by creator