Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldM to Politics Unfiltered@lemmy.world · 13 days agoKamala Harris' VP pick Tim Walz is brutally mocked for 'campaigning for Trump' after bizarre 'four more years' rantwww.dailymail.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down126
arrow-up1-23arrow-down1external-linkKamala Harris' VP pick Tim Walz is brutally mocked for 'campaigning for Trump' after bizarre 'four more years' rantwww.dailymail.co.ukSocialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldM to Politics Unfiltered@lemmy.world · 13 days agomessage-square18fedilink
minus-squareSocialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down10·13 days agoAnd one that the Democratic party 100 percent uses on Trump everytime he fucks up his word salad. lol
minus-squareSmokumJoe@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·13 days agoIt only seems that way just because he absolutely fucks 100% of the time, it’s just that the cultists can’t see the emperor has no clothes.
minus-squareSocialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down6·13 days agoSo it’s ok if Democrats do attack someone for that, but NOT ok if Republicans do it. Right?
minus-squareSmokumJoe@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·13 days agoWell in this attempt it’s completely misleading. He was obviously referring to Trump’s 4 years as President. This article is trying to to paint a picture that doesn’t exist.
minus-squareSocialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·13 days agoIt’s not misleading. They totally know that he was obviously referring to Trump. They are just ragging on him about it. Not something I would do, but hey, I’m not republican, so…
And one that the Democratic party 100 percent uses on Trump everytime he fucks up his word salad. lol
It only seems that way just because he absolutely fucks 100% of the time, it’s just that the cultists can’t see the emperor has no clothes.
So it’s ok if Democrats do attack someone for that, but NOT ok if Republicans do it. Right?
Well in this attempt it’s completely misleading. He was obviously referring to Trump’s 4 years as President.
This article is trying to to paint a picture that doesn’t exist.
It’s not misleading. They totally know that he was obviously referring to Trump. They are just ragging on him about it.
Not something I would do, but hey, I’m not republican, so…