• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t know if any of the three words “anarcho communist city” are any more than vague approximations when it comes to Çatalhöyük.

    • ooli@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      how would you describe it? a no street settlement? a roof way village? a gigantic family house?

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 months ago

        “Proto-city settlement” is generally what it is referred to as by archaeologists.

        And it was as “anarcho communist” as pretty much all other human societies at the time. That was just the state of humanity as a whole at the time as far as we know. Hunter/gatherer groups, small farming settlements, and the occasional larger farming settlement like this one. Hierarchies of power hadn’t become a thing yet.

  • MolochAlter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Kind of a stupid decision to call something pre-currency and pre-codified laws “anarcho communist”.

    It’d be like calling something born before animal life “vegan” because it doesn’t eat animals.

    Technically correct, maybe, but very much missing the point of the label.

    • ooli@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      i needed your comment to realize I forgot to put the wiki link. You can forward your complaint to Bookchin ;)

      Noting the lack of hierarchy and economic inequality, historian and anti-capitalist author Murray Bookchin has argued that Çatalhöyük was an early example of anarcho-communism.[40]

      • Stovetop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Out of curiosity, do you know if any other historians/archaeoanthropologists who would make that same claim?

        Not to say it’s wrong, but I can see how it would be tempting as a self-declared anti-capitalist to want to interpret the findings in a way that conforms to (and thereby confirms) my worldview.

        • ooli@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I heard about Catalhoyuk yesterday… So i have no clue how scientist are perceiving it. But the construction: all together under the same roof, with no street, is pretty striking.

          Obviously this dude calling it “anarcho communist” is biased… the wiki article seems to purposely avoid a neutral tone to make it clear.
          But I can see why he came to that conclusion. I dont think we have any other settlement even remotely resembling this one, to make a more informed guess

  • Scott@lem.free.as
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!