Arthur Besse@lemmy.mlM to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-222 days agotension on kernel mailing lists continues to grow as a Linux Foundation board member finally replies with a "summary of the legal advice the kernel is operating under" re: enforcing US sanctionslore.kernel.orgexternal-linkmessage-square109fedilinkarrow-up1249arrow-down114cross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
arrow-up1235arrow-down1external-linktension on kernel mailing lists continues to grow as a Linux Foundation board member finally replies with a "summary of the legal advice the kernel is operating under" re: enforcing US sanctionslore.kernel.orgArthur Besse@lemmy.mlM to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-222 days agomessage-square109fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
minus-squaremoonlight@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up16·22 days agoDoesn’t Linux already have a bunch of forks? I’m using the CachyOS kernel, for example
minus-squareJustMarkov@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·22 days agoThat’s true, but how much hard-forks do you know?
minus-squareporl@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·20 days agoAt least one for each manufacturer that uses it under the hood in a Tivo-like manner
Doesn’t Linux already have a bunch of forks? I’m using the CachyOS kernel, for example
That’s true, but how much hard-forks do you know?
Relevant, maintained? Zero.
At least one for each manufacturer that uses it under the hood in a Tivo-like manner