• Veraxus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think they’re playing the same game OpenAI is. Nonprofits can “own” for-profits.

      No, it’s not rational or ethical or reasonable, but it’s a thing, because Capitalism gotta Capitalism.

      • NostraDavid@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Nonprofits can “own” for-profits.

        One of the saner reasons for this structure is that the non-profit owns the things the for-profit works on. If the for-profit goes under, all things are still owned by the non-profit, so some large tech company can’t swoop in and yoink anything available.

        This includes any and all data generated by the for-profit, which means your data is “safe”.

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          The non-profit could sell the for-profit, or it would inherit the debt of the for-profit if it didn’t bankrupt it.

  • pivot_root@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    2024 is going to be the year of the Linux Desktop enshittification. When anything you love goes public, you won’t be loving it for much longer.

    • Resol van Lemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Nope, it has been ongoing since 2013. From Adobe stopping physical sales of Creative Suite, to the Xbox One being announced, to Apple flattening iOS to the point of it looking like ass, the enshittification has started at this point in time. And their excuse was to be “more modern”, my ass.

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Rockchip processors is where it’s at these days. Every pi alternative runs an RK3566 or RK3568

      For true open source it’s gotta be RISCV instead of ARM. Bbut it might be too early days for that.

    • mesamune@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah its really too bad. I used to love the company but now I just don’t see them making things for hobbies. Anyone know of some good alternatives? Ive heard good things about lepotato?

      • bluGill@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        They were never about hobbies. We were a niche that they were happy to have, but they never cared. Origionally it was about education (which has a large overlap with hobbies so they served well).

          • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            The official ones are a mess, but depending on your needs, you can use armbian. It supports orange pi boards, and is a nice and up to date distro.

          • Landless2029@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            That’s the biggest issue. Support.

            Most of the success of the RPi is due to rasparian and community support.