• solarbabies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Hey, that’s my favorite System of a Down lyric!

    All research and successful health policies show

    That walking should be increased

    And law enforcement decreased while abolishing

    Mandatory minimum parking spots

    I buy my crack, I smack my bitch

    Right here in Hollywood

    • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I just love that the “law enforcement decreased” line didn’t change.

      It’s just always applicable.

  • psvrh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    There’s parking In Montreal?

    I suppose that’s what potholes are for…

    • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      yeah im not sure how I feel on this. I have known folks who will drive their ice car around and around a block to access free parking. I want more cars parked and not running than running. Especially if self driving cars become a true thing. If its cheaper folks will totally have their cars drive back home and then a few hours later drive to pick them up and double their energy usage and exhaust.

      • Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        The problem is tons of free parking everywhere needlessly sprawls out our cities, makes people drive further, and makes actual green methods of transit (like walking, cycling, and electrified public transit) less viable.

        In the long term, maintaining car dependency is fundamentally incompatible with addressing the climate crisis. Removing mandatory parking minimums is a necessary step towards ending car dependency.

        • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I mean the common podium design with a garage at the bottom works well and the space is not desirable in condo design. Larger high rises are the same as higher is more sought. Your not really losing housing as the parking is cheaper than fully done residentail for the square feet and taking much less square feet overall. I know a 3 over one that gives two spaces so a 6 over one should be able to do one easy enough and since lower sizes should be able to get the same out of even four flats as it just needs one additional story.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Why do you hate affordable housing? I mean, you do realize how incredibly expensive those parking podiums are, right? Forcing developers to build them basically guarantees the development will have to be “luxury” in order to make the economics work.