Dot.@feddit.org to People Twitter@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 3 days agoWhat can we dofeddit.orgimagemessage-square125fedilinkarrow-up1549arrow-down152file-text
arrow-up1497arrow-down1imageWhat can we dofeddit.orgDot.@feddit.org to People Twitter@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square125fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarepearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agoI’m not providing anything because the fact that inheritances exist isn’t something that requires a peer reviewed study. But you know this since you’re being intentionally obtuse.
minus-squareKⒶMⒶLⒶ WⒶLZ 2Ⓐ24@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoyour assertion isn’t that inheritances exist, but that removing billionaires will result in more billionaires continuing the destruction of the planet. there is no evidence for this, since billionaire removal has not been tested.
minus-squarepearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoThe people who inherit the billions will be the billionaires who take their place. I’m not sure why this is such a hard concept to grasp.
minus-squareKⒶMⒶLⒶ WⒶLZ 2Ⓐ24@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 day agobut we don’t know that they would continue the actions that led to their predecessors removal. it’s an interesting theory and we can test it!!
I’m not providing anything because the fact that inheritances exist isn’t something that requires a peer reviewed study.
But you know this since you’re being intentionally obtuse.
your assertion isn’t that inheritances exist, but that removing billionaires will result in more billionaires continuing the destruction of the planet. there is no evidence for this, since billionaire removal has not been tested.
The people who inherit the billions will be the billionaires who take their place. I’m not sure why this is such a hard concept to grasp.
but we don’t know that they would continue the actions that led to their predecessors removal. it’s an interesting theory and we can test it!!