Thankfully, this hasn’t come up yet. This march in Ohio is probably going to be the smallest (10 people) but certainly won’t be the last.
As we won’t see the sort of blowback we did with Charlottesville this time around given the wildly different political landscape, this isn’t a one-off.
After discussing with other site leaders, this feels like the best compromise. Such art can be triggering for some, but open Nazism in the U.S. can’t just be ignored, and photos can be of more utility than text in some cases.
Edit : a suggestion: maybe a new tag could be implemented that separates pornography and other explicit content of the sort from nsfw because of graphic or disturbing content. (I know this would have to be done at the Dev level, maybe you folk could push that instead of what is happening)
First off, I like a variety of sources and instances, I like this one.
Now, it would seem your argument boils down to people can’t take care of themselves. Can’t use the tools available. And you are completely dismissive of my concerns. To suggest I don’t care is … Something.
I get people have triggers. That’s why people use CW or Trigger Warning labels.
Making it NSFW outright blocks it from the majority of users feeds.
Sure, I’m a guest. We all are.
You’re just making it less useful.
You are FORCING users to have to view other NSFW things in order to be informed when keyword filters would work for those that need them.
So, those triggered by porn etc will have to deal with that.
I don’t see how this can work.
It’s ultimately an editorial decision made after consulting with admins. There’s no evidence to suggest the new guideline will ever have to come into play, so claiming the community is already less useful is hyperbole. This is a prophylactic measure.