in my country: it’s the left because of the external forces that are intended to drive the disunity. the right also has similar disunity, but they’re mostly left alone since their platforms mostly align with our ruling classes.

In the west?

The right only infights after they win.

The left is addicted to being losers so we fight amongst each other before even battling the right

1. The right ultimately collaborate around the brutalising force of capital
2. The left could “in-fight” within a vanguard party and show a united front to the outside guided by the mass line with a scientific approach (ie ML). Enlightened in-fighting is good for both development of theory and praxis. A false unity is undialectic and idealistic.

The left argues relentlessly and sabotages each other, but the far right tend to kill each other when the infighting starts.

One thing the far-right is really good at is accepting the scale of moderation and of dog-whistling.

Guys with swastika face tattoos like and approve of guys like Nigel Farage, and they’re able to build a coalition across that spectrum of extremity.