• hakunawazo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      I don’t support violence at all. But for every mentioned woodchipper, this scene from Tucker & Dale vs Evil is mandatory:

  • spittingimage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I think they’re bad for the economy. Money has to circulate. Every time a billionaire throws another million on the pile, they make things worse for everyone else.

    • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      This is a view we don’t see often enough. Everybody is into hating billionaires the way teenage girls hate the super-hot cheerleader. All they do is complain that it’s not “fair” for somebody to be so rich. There’s not enough discussion of the purely mechanical reasons extreme wealth is bad for the economy, not to mention the corruption opportunities it creates. The ultra-rich don’t spend their money, they just exchange it to trade big blocks of asset ownership back and forth. None of that money ever gets spent on a loaf of bread or a bus ticket, or a GI Joe with the kung fu grip. It essentially disappears from the economy. I don’t think most people even comprehend how that works - it involves more thought than reacting to memes.

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        They literally steal work out of the system like a parasite. As you say, we shouldn’t be envious, but fix the problem with the money leaking away.

  • Apollo42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    Ideally they’d be taxed into no longer being billionaires.

    Realistically we probably need to violently remind them who holds the actual power before this becomes a reality.

  • zephorah@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 days ago

    They are subsidized by our government. Truly. The broken system created Elon Musk and now the broken system allowed him to buy a presidency for $134 million. Cheap, for him.

    How? That is how much the system has devalued American labor since 1981.

  • AmosBurton_ThatGuy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 days ago

    Asking this question on lemmy is like going to a Linux comm and asking if it’s a good idea to switch from windows to Linux. You’re preaching (asking?) to the choir.

    That said, eat the fucking rich.

  • Harvey656@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    What a funny thing to ask on Lemmy.

    I prefer mine well done, and grilled to perfection personally.

  • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago
    1. I think wealth should be capped at a few million or tens of millions. Too much wealth hoarding keeps money out of circulation at the consumer spending level, which is bad for the economy in general, especially lower income people.
    2. Without knowing anything about a person and how they became a billionaire, I have no opinion on them individually. Jumping to conclusions about someone based on the group they belong to (like say, a black guy walking down the street) is bigoted thinking, no matter who the target is.
    • Azal@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’ve always liked the idea of you can get $999,999,999.99 after that 100% tax rate and you get a plaque that says “Congratulations, you won capitalism”

      • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I feel that eventually somebody will crack the problem of how to reward people for beating capitalism. Various zillionaires have said that at some point money ceases to be a motivating factor. They’re driven by other things, and by the time they personally become super wealthy they’ve already achieved all the things that are going to benefit society. Further wealth accumulation beyond that point wasn’t their goal, and I really don’t think a wealth cap would deter those people or deprive the world of their achievements at all.