A series of brain injuries and other serious health ailments that struck hundreds of U.S. diplomats and intelligence officials was almost certainly the work of a U.S. adversary, according to a new report by lawmakers, who accuse U.S. intelligence agencies of trying to hide the truth.

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 days ago

      Ooh! Looks like we can add Havana Syndrome to the list of things you’re not allowed to question on .world. Is there anything the US government says that we’re allowed to doubt?

      • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        18 days ago

        Pretty every other comment here is, more or less, agreeing with you that the IC consensus was right, it probably wasn’t a foreign adversary, congress doesn’t know what it’s talking about, and the evidence is that this report and this story is a bunch of crap.

        Yours was the only comment that was shouty, condescending, and insulting, in addition to saying that the report is wrong. You were not censored for your content.

          • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            18 days ago

            I am trying to help you understand how to not get your comments removed, and also to have more productive interactions online.

            If you’re not interested, then fine. I can tell you the information, but I can’t make you absorb it. I’m not interested in being drawn into an extensive and pointless debate about what some other person wrote in their report field and why.

            • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              18 days ago

              Hey, you know who could actually help me know how to avoid getting my comments removed? The mod who removed my comment. You know, in that little space underneath the action in the modlog where they’re supposed to list the reason for removal? Well, the good news is they told me, and the reason that they told me is that they consider the information that I wrote to be false. So I have concluded that that’s the reason it was removed. Because the person who removed it told me so.