• ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    I don’t think New England is a useful category anymore, since modern-day Maine doesn’t have more in common with the Boston area than it does with upstate New York. I’d extend what they’re calling the “NYC Metro” area from Boston in the north to Philadelphia (or maybe even D.C.) in the south as a sort of east coast mega-city.

    • BananaPeal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 days ago

      Head on over to Boston and tell them that they’re in the NYC Metro area, I dare you. I want to watch.

      Instead, split New England into Southern and Northern. Southern includes Mass, Rhode Island, Eastern Connecticut (the NYC Metro area is fine there), and south New Hampshire. Northern is everything else. Some may argue that Portland, Maine should be included in Southern, but I argue that while the culture has some similarities to Southern New England, it’s more similar to the rest of Maine. Go to a redneck party in Southern Maine and start talking about the Old Port. Pay attention to how many people have an opinion.

      • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        I’m not saying it would be called “the NYC metro area”. I’ve lived in Boston and I’ve lived in NYC and I think that while people in Boston would indeed object, the cultural differences are largely superficial. In my experience, Boston is more different from southern New Hampshire than it is from NYC.

    • MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 days ago

      I’d extend what they’re calling the “NYC Metro” area from Boston in the north to Philadelphia (or maybe even D.C.) in the south as a sort of east coast mega-city.

      What you’re describing is called the I95 Corridor.