• glimse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    That’s an incredibly flimsy argument. People have been writing messages on ammo since ammo existed. There’s not even an established pattern of terrorists writing on ammo - they’re more likely to claim credit for an attack after the fact and include their message there.

    Those were words for him. Deny and defend this, mother fucker.

    • RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      You assert my argument is flimsy, yet your argument is that someone is going to be able to read the casings popping out of a guy’s gun shooting at him from behind?

      Lol. Lmao, even.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Please tell me you’re trolling so I don’t think I’m talking to someone THIS obtuse.

        Do you think this writing was to make a political message in the wreckage? Do you think really I think the soldiers who wrote it expected the victims to read it on the way down?

        No, you moron, it’s a message to the victim that the killer knows they’ll never read. It’s a personal touch on the ammo that empowers the shooter. A more poetic version of “a bullet with your name on it”

        Added bonus for you