• funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The voting system to suppress content suppresses reasonable views and ends up with highly upvoted nazi shit. Not because everyone is a Nazi (arguable) but because nazis have a motivation to push an agenda.

    • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      If Nazi shit is highly upvoted, then the community is already lost.

      The voting system works, for the most part. Moderation is just to get rid of the early comment bullshit, or cull the already downvoted to hell posts.

      I really don’t understand when moderators burn entire comment trees or lock threads. It defeats the purpose of the whole system, and makes it look like the community can’t do its job.

      • Krudler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        The voting system only serves to push people’s biases to the top. 98% of the top-rated comments on Reddit are worse than trash because they misinform, or are a regurgitation of a commonly-accepted half-truth.

      • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Honestly, it really sounds like you don’t understand moderation on Reddit. The admins can and will come in a couple days later, see that you didn’t handle the removal of content deemed against sitewide rules, then hold the moderation team accountable for not handling it.

        Once in a while, or during a huge influx is fine. But repeated “slips” results in the admins taking action against the sub itself, and in certain cases even the mods who are ignoring the problem.

        What you are assuming is the case, simply isn’t.