• PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Who gets upset about cutting the crust off? It’s just the part of the bread that was most directly exposed to the heat

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Well, lots of us were parented to not throw food away. Just the thought of someone always cutting off the crust when they’re eating bread, that does irk me in that sense, too.

      But as someone else in this thread already said, with proper bread, the crust is actually good. Then it just seems really strange to cut off the interesting part of the bread and to just want the samey stuff in the middle.

      • Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        So I’m just curious, where the hell did all the wonderbread hate come from? It’s like suddenly everyone has a vendetta against it. I’m not particularly fond of it myself in lieu of traditional bread but like, it’s fine?? The added sugar/HFCS is fucked but I’m pretty sure you can buy varieties that don’t have that.

      • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Is it? Being the cookediest part doesn’t seem like something that’d inherently draw the nutrients into it

        • Delphia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Theres a lot of studies that say yes and that say no. The crust contains more nutrients, but also more potentially not great compounds. So its not like its 100% true or false, I just dont want my kid refusing to eat 20% of the bread I buy, so Im going with true.

          • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Bread doughs are homogeneous unless they have inclusions.

            The crust is the exact same stuff, but extra maillard browning reactions. Certainly more tasty compounds, but I have a hard time believing they’re more nutritious.

  • xeekei@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I break the pasta so it’ll fucking fit in the fucking bowl; leave me alone!

      • Strykker@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        And before anyone complains that that takes too long, it’ takes like 30 seconds. If waiting that long is gonna ruin your pasta night it’s already fucked.

      • xeekei@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Then half of it will be slightly more cooked than the other. Small issue, sure, but bigger issue than not keeping every strand twice as long which doesn’t benefit anything whatsoever.

        • Godnroc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          It does if you twirl your fork to collect the spaghetti. The longer stands form a ball of sauce and noodles with only a few stands. If the noodles are half as long, they may not stay twirled, can flop around more, and require more stands to reach the same size. More mess, more work.

          Also, I would challenge you to tell which end of the pasta went in first. Actually, it would be a challenge to even find a way to test that…