• Freefall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Our trash-tier system only supports two parties. If you would normally vote blue (caring about others and being anti-genocide tells me you would be more left than right) and don’t do so this time, your lack of a blue vote means red needs one less to win. This functionally means you would be voting red. Your spoiler-vote protest would actually mean something in ranked-choice or other systems, but we don’t have that, so you are just voting red, but with more steps.

    I am all for any other candidate, to be fair, but the whole non-voting or spoiler-votingis a different thing entirely.

    • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      This functionally means you would be voting red. Your spoiler-vote protest

      It’s not a protest vote. I want the Greens to win. And if everyone voted Green, then the Greens would win.

      Maybe you’re preventing the Greens from winning by voting Blue.

      • Freefall@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Ok, so it is just a spoiler vote. The greens don’t have a chance and never have. Sorry, it is still real world vs pipedream. This is where ranked choice would come in. People could vote green with blue as a second choice. When green inevitably loses, then your votes would go blue instead of red, like they will now.

        A full swap from blue to green by the entire party is a prisoners dilemma AT BEST.