• T00l_shed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 个月前

      All Wyverns are dragons, but not all Dragons are Wyverns! Also the person I replied to said gryphon!

    • prongs@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 个月前

      Genuinely asking - are they? I was under the impression they were distinct, though I suppose it’s also up to the author in whichever fiction. What’s the real-world analogue?

      • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 个月前

        afaik Dragons have no canon with any kind of historical basis but a lot of fantasy tends to gravitate to:

        • 4 legs/arms and any number of wings = dragon
        • 4 limbs 2 of which are wings = wyvern
        • 4 limbs none of which are wings = drake

        All are technically types of dragon though drakes are usually depicted as purely bestial.

        • prongs@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 个月前

          Thanks! For some reason, I’ve never really considered what I would call a “wingless dragon.”

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 个月前

        Traditional mythological definitions. Beyond such things as the fact that the oldest depictions of dragons/wyrms didn’t even have wings at all, until Reddit was invented as a disinformation factory you’d have been looked at like an idiot for suggesting that wyverns aren’t dragons.

        If you’d like to see proof of this just spend some time looking at Welsh and Briton heraldry or medival art on the topic.

        • prongs@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 个月前

          I suppose Chinese mythology and draconic depictions have their own thing too. Thanks for indulging me.