• btaf45@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    “Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive.”

    I could be wrong, but I think this verbage was just added. Which is fine, because I suggested to mods that they make any rules about this explicit after they nuked the whole discussion. The only message to me was that it was nuked because of an “altered title”.

    Even so. My “title fairly describes link contents”. I changed it exactly to “be more descriptive”. So it does confirm to newest standards. But at least now there is something that sort of relates.

    Censorship is a serious accusation, this doesn’t clear it.

    It is serious enough for me to be glad that Lemmy has multiple sites to post things so that no one set of people are gatekeepers to information. I knew there was a reason why I loved the fact that Lemmy is decentralized.

    • xthexder@l.sw0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s the same rule text as December 30, 2023: https://archive.ph/RRbPv

      Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive.

      They did not change their rules today.