• Electric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    Ā·
    6 days ago

    What a wild ban reason but also weird to go the nuclear route over it. They really should have just made their own instance if they dislike it.

    • Boeman@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      Ā·
      5 days ago

      Not really. How many times have you been asked a question in ā€œbad faithā€ (political views, the type of movies you like, your food choices) that it makes you not want to ever answer a question like it again, even if itā€™s in ā€œgood faithā€. Playing the victim without even looking at it from another point of view is the problem. Now, try to see it from ADAā€™s viewā€¦ there is a lot of work that goes into being an admin of an instance, and this instance is a safe space. You see these things enough times and you get fed up with it. Maybe not everyone agrees it was the best action, but it wasnā€™t an incorrect action.

      One thing I have learned in my nearly 5 decades on this planet is that everyone sees things differently.

      I try to be an ally to everyone different than myself. Iā€™m not perfect at it, heā€™ll sometimes Iā€™m downright terrible at it. But, I find trying to see things from anotherā€™s perspective can be helpful (as long as itā€™s not from hatred and/or intolerance).

        • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          Ā·
          5 days ago

          I agree that having some sort of ban appeal system would be good, at least once, so that users that didnā€™t correctly understand the instance or were acting in good faith can learn, but itā€™s not currently easy and it would give a lot of work to admins/mods, so it is what it is.